Section 19 — Necklace Trajectory Analysis

The necklace went up and over

Three independent camera angles document the trajectory of a 32-gram stainless-steel necklace during the September 10, 2025 incident at Utah Valley University. The chain travels upward from its rest position at the neckline, passes over the back of the head, and settles draped across the left shoulder. A single broken link is additionally observed departing forward in the opposite direction. The motion epicenter localizes to chest level — the documented position of the RØDE Wireless PRO transmitter — not the anterior neck.

2
Independent angles
Side and rear (synchronized)
32 g
Chain mass
4mm stainless box link, 26 in
21+ m/s
Launch velocity
47+ mph — 22.5 cm apex above launch
15.6 J
Total event energy
Minimum at epicenter (necklace KE + deformation work + acoustic dissipation)
01 — Overview

What two cameras saw

On September 10, 2025, during a public event at Utah Valley University, a man wearing a stainless-steel chain necklace was the subject of a sudden energetic event at his upper body. Two independent recordings — a side-view captured at 60 fps native and exported by the InShot editor at 120 fps playback (slow-motion), and a rear-view from a stage-position camera — capture the same brief window from two geometric perspectives. All side-view timestamps in this analysis are computed against the source avg_frame_rate (≈ 61.24 fps) and therefore represent real-world event time, not editor-rendered playback time.

Each recording independently documents the same physical outcome: the chain travels upward and posteriorly from its rest position at the front neckline, passes over the back of the head, and comes to rest draped across the left shoulder and down the back of the body.

This analysis is published as part of the independent forensic record relevant to State of Utah v. Tyler Robinson (preliminary hearing May 18, 2026). It is not a physics model or a simulation. It is a direct presentation of frames extracted from two source recordings, with synchronized stage markers identifying matching points across both angles. The science either holds up under examination or it does not — and source files for every observation are linked below for independent verification.

02 — Two-Angle Synchronized Evidence

Same event, two geometries

Use the stage strip to navigate the eight observable stages of the event window. Each stage is anchored to two simultaneous frames — one side-view (60 fps native source) and one rear-view (stage-position camera) — sampled at every interval. The two angles independently document the same physical sequence. Each stage is documented by frames from all three source recordings, aligned to matching physical configurations rather than identical timestamps (each camera captured at a different fps and started at a different absolute time). Stage timestamps are local to each source file.

Stage 01
Pre-Event Baseline
T+0 ms
Stage 02
Initial Disturbance
~T+15 ms
Stage 03
Launch
~T+30 ms
Stage 04
Ascent
~T+250 ms
Stage 05
Apex
T+588 ms
Stage 06
Descent
~T+700 ms
Stage 07
Over Head
~T+800 ms
Stage 08
End State
~T+1.2 s
Stage 01 of 05
◆ Side View
60 fps native · 120 fps playback
InShot_20260328_
173821094.mp4
Side-view evidence frame
LOADING
Side-View · Stage 01 Subject in 3/4 profile. No disturbance. Chain not visible at this moment (rests under shirt collar at front of body).
◇ Rear View
Stage-position camera
Screen_Recording_
20260313_112029.mp4
Rear-view evidence frame
LOADING
Rear-View · Stage 01 Subject seated at desk facing crowd. View from rear-stage camera. Chain not visible from this angle when at rest in front position.
03 — Subject Necklace

The chain that cleared the head

The necklace is a 4 mm stainless steel box-link chain in the style of David Yurman, approximately 26 inches in length. At rest, it sits at the front neckline of a typical t-shirt collar, with the clasp at the back of the neck. The physical specifications below were verified against the recovered chain and against retail specifications for box-link chains of this dimension and material.

ParameterValueVerification source
Material Stainless steel (304/316 grade typical) Visual inspection, color/density consistent
Link style Box link (square cross-section) Macro photography of recovered chain
Link cross-section 4 mm × 4 mm Caliper measurement
Length 26 in / 66 cm Direct measurement
Total mass ~32 g Direct weighing
Clasp Lobster claw, intact Visual inspection — clasp did not fail
Tensile failure point ~89 N between links Retail spec for 4 mm stainless box chain
Failure location Between links (not at clasp) Recovered chain shows broken link, intact clasp
Forensic significance — failure location

The chain failed at a link, not at the clasp. The lobster-claw clasp remains intact and operable. This is consistent with sudden in-plane tensile loading exceeding the per-link failure strength (~89 N), and inconsistent with the chain being pulled off through the clasp by a hooking force on the chain body. Whatever broke the chain delivered enough force to fail a stainless steel link rated above 89 N tensile.

04 — Trajectory Observed

The chain went up, back, and over

The three video angles document the same trajectory geometry. The chain begins at the front neckline (Stage 01 — Baseline), responds to an initial disturbance (Stage 02), is launched upward and rearward at the energetic event (Stage 03 — Launch), ascends behind the back of the head (Stage 04 — Ascent), reaches maximum visibility draped across the back of the head (Stage 05 — Apex), descends as the trajectory completes (Stage 06), settles over the back of the head with hair displaced (Stage 07), and comes to rest across the left shoulder and down the back of the body (Stage 08 — End State). The path of the chain bulk is incompatible with any horizontal-only impulse mechanism — the chain must have received an impulse with a vertical component to travel from the front of the body to the posterior end-state.

ObservationSide viewRear view
Initial chain position Front neckline (under collar) Not visible (occluded by body)
Frame at peak observation Frame 06 (apex) F=2910, t=84.89s
Visible chain feature Silver line across back of head Silver chain on back of head/shoulder
Final chain position Draped over back of head (visible) Left shoulder, down back side of body
Trajectory direction Up and rearward Over the top of head
Geometric requirement — vertical impulse component

A chain at rest at the front of the body cannot reach the rear of the body via a horizontal impulse alone. The starting position (anterior neckline) and ending position (posterior shoulder / down the back) are separated by the body itself. Any trajectory connecting these two endpoints requires the chain to clear the body vertically, which in turn requires an impulse with both upward and posterior horizontal components. The horizontal-bullet-impact mechanism alone cannot produce this trajectory.

05 — Link Departure (Single-Frame Observation)

One link went the other way

At the moment of the energetic event, a single broken link from the chain is observable in the side-view footage as a small bright object departing forward and toward the viewer's right — in the direction opposite the chain bulk's trajectory. The link is approximately 1–2 pixels wide in the source frame, visible against the contrasting red of a MAGA hat in the foreground crowd. The InShot zoom-annotated version of the side-view footage (file InShot_20260405_145048774.mp4) magnifies this region of the original frame to make the feature visible to the unaided eye.

Because the link is observable in a single frame only, its trajectory is not tracked across multiple frames. The single-frame observation is documented for transparency; the forensic significance lies in the direction of departure, not in a continuous trajectory measurement. Open the Link Evidence button above to see the source frames and the conservation-of-momentum analysis.

Bidirectional motion — conservation of momentum signature

The chain bulk (~31 g) travels upward and rearward. A single broken link (~1 g) is observed departing forward in the opposite direction. By conservation of momentum within the chain system at rest before the event: mlink × vlink ≈ mbulk × vbulk,horizontal With mlink ≈ 1 g and mbulk ≈ 31 g, the link's forward velocity is approximately 31× the chain bulk's horizontal velocity component. This split — small mass forward, large mass backward and upward — is the conservation-of-momentum signature of an internal impulse source. A unidirectional horizontal external impact (the prosecution's claimed mechanism) would propel all chain fragments in the same direction (the projectile's direction) and cannot produce this bidirectional split. The bidirectional motion is independently incompatible with the horizontal-impact-only hypothesis.

06 — Synthesis

Two observations, one conclusion

Two independent recordings, captured by different devices at different geometric perspectives, document the same physical event window. Each of the two observations below is independent — each could be presented and defended on its own evidentiary merit. The two observations are presented here together because they converge on the same conclusion.

ObservationSourceConclusion supported
Chain trajectory — up, back, over head Side view (60 fps native / 120 fps playback) + Rear view (stage-position camera) Impulse with upward + posterior horizontal components
Bidirectional link departure Side view single-frame (InShot zoom annotation) Internal impulse mechanism, not external unidirectional impact
The combined picture

The chain trajectory requires an upward impulse to clear the body from front neckline to posterior shoulder. The bidirectional link departure is the momentum-conservation signature of an internal impulse source. Both observations are consistent with an internal energetic event at the documented RØDE Wireless PRO transmitter position, and both are independently inconsistent with a horizontal bullet impact at the anterior neck. The forensic implication is not that the prosecution's claimed mechanism is implausible — it is that the prosecution's claimed mechanism is incompatible with what two independent cameras directly recorded.

07 — Source Files

Verify it yourself

Every observation in this exhibit derives from raw video files listed below. The frames embedded in the side and rear panels are extracted directly from these sources with no compositing, no rendering, and no augmentation. The InShot zoom-annotated version of the side-view source is included separately so that the single-frame link departure can be examined at the magnification level used by the InShot author.

InShot_20260411_160227806.mp4

Side-view source (close-crop InShot export). 1920×896. Captured at 60 fps native; InShot export declares 120 fps playback (slow-motion). Timestamps computed from avg_frame_rate ≈ 61.24 fps represent real-world event time. Eight sequential frames (1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 9, 10) extracted across the event window are displayed in the side-view panel above.

Download →

InShot_20260328_173821094.mp4

Side-view source (wider-crop InShot export, prior version). 1920×896, 82 frames, 1.34 s. Same physical event window as the close-crop export above. Retained for chain-of-custody completeness and independent re-extraction.

Download →

Screen_Recording_20260313_112029_YouTube.mp4

Rear-view stage-position camera (YouTube screen recording). 2316×1080, ~34 fps, 177 s. Content rectangle at x=873, w=569. Eight sequential frames spanning the event window are displayed in the rear-view panel above (Pre-Event through Resting Place).

Download →

InShot_20260405_145048774.mp4

InShot zoom-annotated version of the side-view source. 1920×896, 30 fps, 25.92 s. Zoom circles emphasize the back-of-head region and the single-frame link departure feature.

Download →

For the underlying energy budget, chain physical specifications, and integration with the broader epicenter analysis, see Section 04 — The Epicenter and Section 13 — Circuit Board Trajectory Analysis on the main page.